Click here to leave this site quickly

If you are worried someone might check what websites you visit, find out about web safety

Rape Crisis Scotland


08088 01 03 02

Phone the free Rape Crisis Scotland Helpline
Every day, 6pm to midnight


The list below shows some useful publications both from Rape Crisis Scotland and from other organisations. You can browse through these publications using the list on the right hand side of this page. We have categorised them by publication type, as well as a tagging system to help you find what you are looking for.

You may need Adobe Acrobat to view some of these.

Stopping harassment: a legal guide
Stopping harassment: a legal guide

The Scottish Women’s Rights Centre (SWRC) has developed this legal guide for survivors of gender based violence who are experiencing harassment.  The ‘Stopping Harassment’ legal guide explains how to obtain protective orders to improve women’s safety and will be a helpful resource for any woman living with stalking or harassment or for professionals who may have a role in supporting survivors. 

Publication: Leaflets

RCS Written Evidence on COPFS
RCS Written Evidence on COPFS

Written evidence from Rape Crisis Scotland submitted to the Justice Committee's inquiry into the role and purpose of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service


Police & legal advice
Police & legal advice

Rape Crisis Scotland information leaflet on police & legal advice following sexual violence

Publication: RCS Support resources

Information and help after rape and sexual assault
Information and help after rape and sexual assault

Scottish Government publication offering a range of information for survivors of rape and sexual assault - 2016 edition.

Publication: Resources

Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill: A Rape Crisis Scotland Briefing
Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill: A Rape Crisis Scotland Briefing

Rape Crisis Scotland has produced a Briefing Paper on the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill, which was introduced by the Scottish Government following Lord Carloway’s review and takes forward his recommendations. Although the Bill covers a range of measures, our focus is very much on matters of concern to victims of sexual crimes.

Publication: Briefings

Consultation on criminalising the purchase of sex in Scotland: RCS response

The response RCS submitted to the consultation on criminalizing the purchase of sex in Scotland.

Publication: Resources

Sensitive and personal records: information for victims of sexual crimes

This leaflet explains why the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (the prosecutor) may need to obtain sensitive and personal records, held by bodies such as the NHS, and how this information may be used.

Publication: Leaflets

Briefing Paper on Carloway Review

Following the UK Supreme court’s Cadder ruling last year, the Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill asked Lord Carloway to undertake a review to consider the implications of the ruling and make recommendations.

The Cadder ruling relates to an accused’s right to legal representation during police questioning, and has had a particular impact on sexual offences.  Due to the difficulties in obtaining corroboration in sexual offences cases (because they often happen in private, with no witnesses) the police prior to Cadder were often reliant on admissions from the accused to help them build a case.  Since the Cadder decision, defence lawyers seem to be routinely advising their clients to make no comment at all during police interviews, which is causing serious difficulties and has the potential to make prosecutions in rape cases even more difficult.

As well as considering questions relating to legal representation for the accused, Lord Carloway has also been considering broader issues relating to evidence, including the requirement for corroboration and whether or not juries should be able to draw an adverse inference if the accused remains silent and refuses to answer any questions. Rape Crisis Scotland has produced a briefing paper outlining our position on these questions raised by the Carloway Review and hope this will be helpful to other agencies planning to respond to the consultation.  The deadline for consultation responses is 3rd June 2011.

Publication: Resources

Disclosure of records and privacy rights in rape cases, by Fiona E. Raitt

The prosecutor’s duty of disclosure of evidence to the defence in criminal prosecutions is one of the cornerstones of adversarial procedural justice and a long-standing principle in Scots law. It is a fundamental component of a fair trial, in particular the principle of equality of arms whereby the greater resources of the state to investigate crime entitle the accused to have access to the same evidential material that is available to the Crown. This is so even if the Crown has no intention of relying upon that material as evidence. The defence has a right to examine all information uncovered in the course of a criminal investigation that might exculpate or mitigate any criminal liability of the accused, or undermine the Crown case.

The Scottish Parliament recently enacted the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 which clarified and re-drew the boundaries of disclosure in Scots law. The Act contains detailed measures for extending the duty of disclosure together with the provisions for judicial regulation of non-disclosure in limited circumstances. This article focuses on a hitherto neglected aspect of disclosure, namely the impact on witnesses and complainers. The article argues that the Act will impact negatively on all witnesses but raise particular concerns for complainers in cases of rape and other serious sexual assaults. In such cases it is predictable that there will be an increase in the disclosure of medical and other personal records of complainers for any potential they have to cast doubt on the credibility and reliability of complainers. For the  purposes of disclosure, sensitive personal information such as mental health history could very possibly be characterised as material and relevant information. The problem with this lies less in the principle of disclosure of these records, and more in the ways in which the privacy interests of complainers could be heavily compromised in circumstances where they will have no access to independent legal advice.

The article explores the experiences in other jurisdictions where the disclosure of personal records has created an additional obstacle for complainants and a further disincentive to reporting rape. Clear parallels can be drawn with the use of sexual history evidence in rape trials which, despite efforts to regulate its admissibility, continues to be deeply problematic.

The extended ambit of disclosure set out in the Act has direct implications for the privacy rights of complainers and it is argued that the Act provides insufficiently robust safeguards for the protection of these individual interests. Given the complex environment in which disclosure obligations in adversarial proceedings must be satisfied, the article argues that on this issue Crown prosecutors cannot adequately discharge their traditional responsibilities to take the interests of complainers into consideration as part of the public interest. The article concludes that complainers should therefore have an entitlement to independent legal representation to pursue their legitimate privacy interests in non-disclosure. Although the article centres on the reforms in Scots law, the issues have broader application in all common law jurisdictions.

Publication: Articles

More Results: