TwitterFacebookInstagram
Click here or press Escape to leave this site now

Working to end sexual violence

Helpline 08088 010302

News

News

RCS calls for the Scottish Government and MSPs to work together to introduce key legislation for survivors of sexual crime

Rape Crisis Scotland have released a briefing calling for MSPs to support key provisions in the Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill, including the establishment of a specialist sexual offences court and changes to the provisions of the contempt of court legislation to allow for approved research with juries.

We are also supporting a number of important additions to the Bill, including a presumption of issuing non harassment orders in sexual offence cases (following the excellent campaigning of Amelia Price) introducing a right to independent advocacy support and introducing a requirement for the criminal justice system to provide a single point of contact for victims.

Changes announced by the Sottish Government to the Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform Bill

The Scottish Government have today announced significant changes to the Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform Bill which is currently going through the Scottish Parliament.

The most significant of these changes is dropping the judge-led pilot, where rape trials were to be heard in front of a single judge, rather than a jury. This pilot was recommended in Lady Dorrian’s review of the management of sexual offence cases.

The Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform Bill presents the biggest chance to improve how sexual offences are handled in Scotland for over a century. Change is urgently needed, and we’re hopeful that this Bill will help to bring about real change for survivors.

We’re disappointed that a pilot of judge-led trials, a significant part of the bill, has been dropped.

Landmark judgment on corroboration in sexual offence cases

A judgement from nine senior judges has been issued today which transforms the approach to corroboration in sexual offence cases in Scotland.  This follows on from a previous Lord Advocate’s reference last October, which resulted in clarification that:

  • Corroboration must still be used to prove the case against the accused. This means that corroboration will be needed to prove that firstly, the crime was committed and secondly, that the person accused in the case is the person who committed it. There is now no requirement for every separate part of a crime to be proven by corroborated evidence.
  • Distress, which is observed by a third party, can corroborate a complainer’s account that they have been raped. Penetration does not need to be corroborated separately.
  • A statement which is made by a complainer after the relevant incident is normally hearsay and cannot be used as proof of fact. An exception to this is where that statement is made de recenti, when the complainer is in a distressed state. Both the statement and the distress, in combination, can be used as proof of fact and as corroboration. They constitute real evidence, when spoken to by another witness (a third party).

New figures show a significant rise in number of reported rapes in Scotland

New figures from Police Scotland show a nearly 20% rise in reported rape cases in recent months.

Behind every number is a survivor who has made the decision, which can be a very difficult one, to report what happened to them to the police. It’s essential that every survivor who does report sexual crime is supported though the process.

We’re intervening in a Supreme Court case

This week, we are at the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in London to intervene in a case which challenges the current restrictions in place in Scotland on what kinds of evidence can be brought up by the defence in sexual offence trials.

This case really matters. Often one of the biggest fears survivors raise with us about going to court is the fear of their sexual history or other aspects of their past being brought up in court.

Follow and support us on social media

FacebookInstagram
Back to top
Loading